Interactive Design:Exercise 1

  

Website Review Exercise: 

First Website:Resn - Loop (https://resn.co.nz/#!/work/loop/)

Resn’s “Loop” website is a visually striking, interactive showcase of their work. The site’s main goal is to immerse users in an engaging experience, which is effectively communicated through its bold design and smooth transitions. With a sleek dark color palette accented by blues and purples, the layout is simple yet modern, allowing the focus to remain on the stunning imagery and professional content.


One of the site’s greatest strengths is its unique interaction design. The transitions and animations, combined with carefully integrated sound, create a cohesive and immersive experience. However, the navigation can be confusing. There are no traditional menus or navigation bars, which makes it difficult for first-time users to find their way around.

While the content is clear and well-organized, the initial load time is a bit long, though the site runs smoothly once fully loaded. The multimedia-heavy nature of the site might also affect performance on older devices.

Strengths:

  • Engaging interactions and transitions.
  • Professional visuals and sound integration.

Weaknesses:

  • Difficult navigation due to unconventional design.
  • Slightly long initial load time.

Recommendation: To improve the usability of the website, clearer navigation cues could be added without compromising the overall visual experience. An introductory guide or hint system might also help new users understand how to interact with the site. Additionally, optimizing the loading time for first-time visitors would enhance the performance and user satisfaction.



Second Website:Pollen Website Review (https://www.pollen.com.au/)

The Pollen website presents a clean, minimalist design with a primarily white color scheme, enhancing the clarity of its content. The homepage’s standout feature is the auto-changing text, adding a dynamic touch that's rarely seen in web design.




Strengths:

  • The website shines through its interactive elements—hovering over titles triggers animations that match the corresponding sections, creating a smooth and engaging experience. 
  • The overall layout is well-organized, with visuals that effectively complement the text, making the content easy to follow and understand.

Weaknesses:

  • One noticeable drawback is the use of multiple fonts for titles, subtitles, and descriptions. This inconsistency can be distracting, and a simpler, uniform font choice could improve the aesthetic appeal. 
  • Additionally, while the homepage loads relatively quickly, subpages take slightly longer, which can affect the user experience.

Visual Design:

The color scheme is subtle and clear, focusing mainly on white, which creates a sleek and modern look. However, the typography, while special in places, feels a bit awkward and could benefit from more refinement.

Performance:

In terms of responsiveness, the animations when hovering over titles work very well and add to the user’s experience. However, the load times when navigating to subpages could be improved for a smoother experience.

Overall, Pollen offers an interactive and organized experience, though its typography and page load times could use some refinement.

Comments